FAQ  •  Register  •  Search  •  Login

You must be a member to enjoy all the features on the site that are hidden from public view.

Members also enjoy browsing advertising free.

» Register

» Login


1984news.com
What Really Happened
IHateTheMedia.com
HackerNews.com


Conspiracy Top Site List



Ammunition To Go Banner Small

Moderator: Mod Squad


Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

13 posts • Page 1 of 1
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:33 pm

Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Share It:

OK, the coincidences are just too bizarre.

It starts with this article that I found today...

BERKELEY, Calif. — BP's catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is fueling opposition to the University of California, Berkeley's research partnership with the British company, with activists on the famously liberal campus demanding a severing of ties.

The oil giant gave UC Berkeley a $500 million grant in 2007 to create the Energy Biosciences Institute, which works to develop new sources of plant-based fuel. The 10-year deal is believed to be the largest-ever corporate sponsorship of university research, but has outraged students and professors who worry the global oil company will exert too much influence over academic research and damage the university's reputation.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... AD9HA60701

$500 million was "donated" by BP? A British based company donates 1/2 billion dollars to a US College to find fuel alternatives. Something stinks. So I dug a little deeper.
Now on the face of things, the Energy Biosciences Institute looks like a good thing, trying to create alternative fuels from plant species. But that all goes away when one digs a little deeper.

To provide alternatives to petroleum-based energy, enhance global security, and reduce carbon emissions, the U.S. government has mandated a greater proportion of our energy portfolio be derived from plant-based fuels (i.e., 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act; EISA). However, the potential benefits of this nascent bioeconomy may be offset by damage to our biosecurity via land-use change, inappropriate agronomics, rapid adoption of novel crops, and/or lack of proper federal oversight (1). Of these potential externalities—the unintended and often negative effects or byproducts from an activity—little attention has been given to economic or ecological damage from invasive biofuel feedstocks. For example, many plant species proposed, and in some cases under development, for biofuel production in the U.S. are invasive species or have a high likelihood of escaping cultivation and becoming invasive

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y

I would ask folks to take a second and read the article. It is quite scary, and is a link I followed from here: http://www.energybiosciencesinstitute.org/
:shocking:

Now, here's where it get's real creepy. Remember the conspiracy theory out a bit ago about turning the Gulf into a dead zone, for creating algae for biofuels? Guess what?

In addition to terrestrial and aquatic macrophyte species, the energy industry is evaluating algae for renewable production of starches for alcohols, lipids for diesel fuel surrogates, and H2 for fuel cells (21). Algae have been shown to produce 250 times more oil than soybeans per unit area, and up to 31 times more oil per area than African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) (22). However, a number of non-native algal species are being considered for biomass, but despite the potentially severe environmental risks, they have yet to be evaluated for their potential escape and impacts. For example, strains of freshwater cyanobacteria such as Anabaena circinalis, Oscillatoria agardhii, and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii produce blooms known to cause serious illness or death to humans and animals. Open-water cultivation of non-native, or highly modified native algae, present an unknown risk to our waterways, drinking water reserves, and higher trophic level effects

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y

When I read that, the hairs on the back of my neck stood up. :wtf1:

But it gets even creepier...

On June 20th, 2010, a blogger named JoAnneMor wrote this...

What they are doing is in three steps.

First get rid of oil industry in Gulf.

Then turn Gulf into a dead zone. A dead zone is free of life or ability to sustain it. The oil, dispersants and fertilizers deplete oxygen. It kills animals and fish, also turning their remains into fertilizer.

Finally, use Gulf as a giant Algae farm. Algae grows on water surface, getting oxygen from air, not water. Fertilizers like Urea supply much needed nitrogen. The Mississippi and the other rivers that empty into Gulf also pick up fertilizers from the many farms along the way. This feeds the Algae at the mouths of these rivers.

The oil in the water won't hurt the Algae. It will only promote it's growth and burn factor.

Algae costs about $2. a Barrel to refine. This is potentially very profitable.

http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill

But this is what really got my attention...

That plan involves projects in the Great Lakes., Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico.

http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill

OK, so officially, I am creeped out...It can't be just a coincidence that this Michigan oil spill is just in the right spot to feed into the Great Lakes...And Chesapeake Bay?

Remember the National Exercise called SONS 2010, which, on April 29th, 2010 held an exercise to combat an oil spill of "national significance" in the Chesapeake Bay?

Date: April 29, 2010

The oil spill response organization, Oil In The Bay, has deployed 60,000 feet of containment boom from Goose Pond to Moss Pond, and in small waterways. Approximately 500,000 more feet of boom has been ordered.

An estimated 12.6 million gallons of Mayan crude oil were originally onboard. The amount of oil spilled in the Chesapeake Bay is currently estimated at 2.25 million gallons. The Captain Banner crew is transferring oil from the ruptured tank to an undamaged tank to minimize spillage.

http://www.sons2010.com/go/doc/2221/515695

The devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is now going on 51 days. Various news reports and prediction modeling has suggested that there is a high probability oil will go beyond the Gulf of Mexico and enter into the Atlantic Ocean. What does that mean for our Chesapeake Bay? Will the oil reach as far north as our bay waters?

http://www.examiner.com/x-43633-Anne-Ar ... apeake-Bay

Now, today, ATS had an interesting thread, by DRJay1975.

Drove over the beach into Destin
, which is a very populated visible area, very different from where I just stopped. As soon as you cross the bridge, huge cleanup crews. Here they are picking up tarballs, unlike orange beach, that story will blow your mind. But they have booms and boats everywhere puttin on a show here. Nothing but the occasional tarball. Until I stepped out on my balcony. Hmm I've never seen the water look like this. Beautiful blue, except from the beach out about 50 yards. Weird green algae bloom. Never seen that here. Very thick. Authorities say it's seaweed. Nope. Looks like the same green algae you'd see in a small stagnant pond.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread598797/pg1

And last, but not least...

All along the coast, people speak of a lack of regulatory commitment and investment in scientific research on the gulf by state and federal lawmakers.

They note, for example, that over the last decade, the Environmental Protection Agency’s financing for the Chesapeake Bay Program, a regional and federal partnership, was nearly five times the amount for a similar Gulf of Mexico program, and a Great Lakes program was given more than four times as much.

http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/201 ... ?p=3&tc=pg

:bye: :bomb:
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:42 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Now, here is where I believe Chemtrails comes into play...

I believe the whole global warming thing is to cover up the Chemtrail/Weather Modification agenda. I think we can all agree
that weather patterns seem to have become unstable.

I don't think it's warming. More like a larger swing of the pendulum.

Weather Modification has been going on for a long time. I can find evidence of it (the military experimenting with it) as far back as 1923.

February 25, 1923, Sunday

The Army Air Service, which has been experimenting with the rain-making and cloud-dispelling process of Warren and Bancroft at McCook Field, will use a captive balloon at the flying field at Moundsville, W. Val., to test the power of electrified sand to banish fogs permanently.

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60A12F7395516738DDDAC0A94DA405B838EF1D3

Over the decades, by far the preferred method has been to suspend silver iodide in acetone, because the silver iodide expands so greatly. They say that burning/spraying 200 lbs of the stuff would cover the entire US in 100,000 particles per square ft.

1000's (maybe even millions) of lbs of the stuff has been sprayed over the US and just about every other country has some sort of program, spraying it from AC or vaporizing it into the atmosphere through ground generators.

Simply put, silver iodide has been widely used for decades to modify the weather globally.

The problem is, that silver iodide is deadly to aquatic environments because de-oxygenates the water. And if this deadly chemical is being spread everywhere through rain and snow, it eventually reaches the creeks, streams and rivers, and ultimately dumping into the ocean, because silver never dissipates.

Here are some examples of the consequences of cloud seeding.


One frequent concern is the state of oxygenation of the oceans. Although mammals aren't capable of gas exchange in water, pretty much everything else in the sea is, but only when the amount of oxygen dissolved in that water is sufficiently concentrated. Unfortunately, a number of factors can affect this, from algal blooms that use up the available oxygen, to warming oceans and altered currents, the result can be hypoxia (low oxygen) or even anoxia (no oxygen) in some regions, where the amount of dissolved O2 cannot support macroorganisms such as fish.


http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2008/05/increased-deoxygenation-of-the-oceans.ars

8/23 HOOD CANAL Hood Canal, known for its deadly oxygen problems, has experienced record-high levels of oxygen since the beginning of the year — but a day of reckoning could be approaching. Researchers have never seen dissolved oxygen levels that stayed as high as they did during the first four months of 2009. That includes measurements taken from 1952 through 1966 and again from 1998 until today. At the moment, the average oxygen concentration remains in a healthy range, but it has been declining rapidly since May. Nobody can predict how low the oxygen level will go as summer turns into fall. When levels become low, the risk of a sudden fish kill increases under certain wind conditions.

http://olyopen.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/hood-canal-oxygen-levels-dropping-fast-kitsap-sun/

Now I could go on and on and show you how everything in the rivers and and oceans are showing symptom of low oxygen levels, especially the algae and mosses. Red tides, starfish washing up, etc.

All of this affects us. Everything! We rely on water to live. We rely on fish to eat. We rely on the algae to convert CO2 into oxygen to keep the oceans oxygenated and the fish alive.

In the last decade, the weather modification went from localized to global. By modifying the weather in the US, they could affect the weather in Europe. By messing with it in Europe, Russia and China can be affected. And so on.

Hence, the Chemtrails. By dispensing silver iodide compounds into the jet stream over Colorado, the chemical can be be controlled/steered through HAARP technology and smartdust design, to affect weather on a completely different continent.

Also, localize water wars can be secretly fought behind closed door water board and power company meetings.

Here’s a thought: what if we could let some of the heat trapped in the atmosphere back out? A few scientists have proposed making skies cloudier in order to reflect light away from Earth, but now David Mitchell of the Desert Research Institute and colleagues are suggesting an opposite approach—get rid of cirrus clouds in the upper troposphere.

Mitchell says it may be possible to increase ice fall speed (i.e. how quickly the ice crystals in clouds “rain out”, essentially) by seeding the atmosphere with extremely efficient ice nuclei, such as silver iodide, which would outcompete natural ice nuclei and create larger ice crystals that fall out more quickly.

http://estagu.wordpress.com/

<scientific explanation>
http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/SFgate/SFgate?&listenv=table&multiple=1&range=1&directget=1&application=fm08&database=/data/epubs/wais/indexes/fm08/fm08&maxhits=200&=%22U43A-0044%22

Hmm, Desert Research Institute?

DRI's Joseph McConnell, Ph.D., received over $3.2 million in NSF awards to study Arctic and Antarctic ice cores for clues regarding the Earth’s climate.

http://www.dri.edu/

"...the core partially melted across the Equator during transportation before it was analysed (Etheridge et al., 1988), but this was neither mentioned by the analysts nor the researchers later using the data (see Jaworowski et al., 1992 b). Rather it was characterized as "the excellent quality of the ice core" and its CO2 concentration data "are assumed to represent the global mean concentration history and used as input data to the model" (Siegenthaler & Oeschger, 1987)."

"In order to make a matching construction between the two age-different non-overlapping curves, it was necessary to make the assumption that the age of the gas inclusion air would have to be 95 years younger than the age of the enclosing ice. But this was not mentioned by the originators Siegenthaler & Oeschger (1987)."

"Both argon-39 and krypton-85 isotopes show that large amounts of ambient air are indeed included in the air inclusions in deep ice cores, and air from the inclusions will not be representative of paleoatmospheres (Jaworowski et al., 1992 b)."

"Contamination from drilling fluids and more than twenty physical-chemical processes occurring in the ice before, during, and after drilling, make ice cores unsuitable for paleoatmospheric work (Jaworowski et al., 1992 b)."

http://www.nov55.com/fakery.html

So, the DRI, being funded by the National Science Foundation, is calling to manipulate global climate because of the manipulated data produced by their global warming scientist in order to cover up the already existing campaign of Chemtrails.
Last edited by stompk on Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

spectre0o0

redAdmin

User avatar

guardian-2

SHTF Staff

Posts: 1223

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:16 am

Location: sharpening my Guillotine,filling the stripper clips

Post Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:05 am

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

3The second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it turned into blood like that of a dead man, and every living thing in the sea died.

4The third angel poured out his bowl on the rivers and springs of water, and they became blood. 5Then I heard the angel in charge of the waters say:
"You are just in these judgments,
you who are and who were, the Holy One,
because you have so judged;
BUT IT'S PROTECTORS AND FRIENDS HAVE BEEN SLEEPING
NOW IT'S A MONSTER THAT WILL NOT OBEY-steppenwolf

ANY POST/THREAD I CREATE REFLECTS MY OPINION ONLY, AND NOT THAT OF THE STAFF OR OWNERS OF SHTF411.COM,AND PROBABLY NOT THE GOVERNMENT
<<

LiveandLearn

User avatar

apprentice-8

Posts: 436

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:54 pm

Post Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:42 am

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

stompk, absolutely wonderful research with putting the pieces together. So I am guessing the use of algae would replace oil, satisfy the 'go green' and be much more profitable. An idea that needs to be followed. Time will tell. Keep us updated if more information comes out.
<<

musselwhite

User avatar

master-10

Posts: 2901

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:16 pm

Location: just outside the box (Georgia)

Post Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:21 am

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

LiveandLearn wrote:stompk, absolutely wonderful research with putting the pieces together. So I am guessing the use of algae would replace oil, satisfy the 'go green' and be much more profitable. An idea that needs to be followed. Time will tell. Keep us updated if more information comes out.
not only wonderful research but sure makes a lot of sense here - :star5: stompk - i look forwarding to following!
http://shtf411.com/destron-fearing-ibm-and-the-holocaust-and-covert-ops-t688.html
" All truth passes through three stages: - First, it is ridiculed. - Second, it is violently opposed. - Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. " Arthur Schopenhauer German philosopher (1788 - 1860) and comes to rest at http://www.SHTF411.com - http://www.jammygrams.com
<<

Winterkitty

User avatar

apprentice-8

Posts: 438

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:31 am

Post Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

I've heard this algae angle before as well. I guess we'll see soon enough if the ocean and great lakes start sprouting massive algae blooms all of a sudden.
The truth... more cleansing than a dozen bran muffins.
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:33 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Winterkitty wrote:I've heard this algae angle before as well. I guess we'll see soon enough if the ocean and great lakes start sprouting massive algae blooms all of a sudden.



I didn't really believe it until I saw the UC Berkeley connection.

It gets better...

LS9, the South San Francisco-based maker of renewable biofuels, has been hot stuff in the cleantech world for a few years. The company counts a trio of star scientific founders in UC Berkeley’s Jay Keasling, Chris Somerville of the Energy Biosciences Institute, and Harvard University’s George Church

http://www.xconomy.com/san-francisco/20 ... -of-truth/

Have you ever heard of Craig Vetner. If not, you should pay attention to this guy. He is ultra creepy...

In 2001, Craig Venter made headlines for sequencing the human genome. In 2003, he started mapping the ocean's biodiversity. And now, in 2010, he's created the first synthetic lifeforms

http://www.ted.com/talks/craig_venter_i ... _life.html

Guess what?

The buzz came from being part of the nascent field of synthetic biology. As Craig Venter has recently demonstrated, scientists are getting better at manipulating the fundamental unit of life, the cell. In the case of LS9, the company has sought to swap in and out a few enzymes inside bacteria so that instead of converting sugars into fatty acids, they could become super-efficient engines for converting sugars into fuels like diesel

http://www.xconomy.com/san-francisco/20 ... -of-truth/

Hmm, wonder where LS9 just built a massive production plant.

LS9, the Renewable Petroleum Company(TM), today announced the acquisition of an existing production facility in Okeechobee, Florida.

http://www.ls9.com/news/pr_100203.html

And, last but not least, you gotta love LS9's logo...

Image


:sick:

More info:
http://www.biofuelsjournal.com/articles ... 92386.html
http://www.ls9.com/news/
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/ ... akthrough/
http://www.google.com/search?q=Trichode ... =firefox-a

A couple of keywords to search are "cyanobacteria" and "trichodesmium"
Last edited by stompk on Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

I think we are headed for the dreaded "green goo"

First it was "gray goo," the threat of self-replicating machines populating the planet. Now an environmental think tank is raising the specter of "green goo," where biology is used to create new materials and new artificial life forms.

In its report, published on July 8, the Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration said the risks from green goo demand the most urgent foresight and caution. "With nanobiotech, researchers have the power to create completely new organisms that have never existed on Earth," said the ETC release accompanying its report.

Read More http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/new ... z0vSOWK0lE




LONG BEACH -- Swimmers, surfers and fishermen are being warned of a mysterious green, slimy substance seen floating in the ocean along the Southern California coast.
Health officials say the floating green stuff is actually a common algal bloom that is the result of increased temperatures, the Long Beach Press-Telegram reported.
http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-o ... 8775.story


Katie Oxford is on the ground and in the boats in Louisiana, reporting from the heart of the Gulf oil spill disaster. This is the fifth of her columns from the scene.
Finding the green slime

About 10 miles farther down the road, I saw something in the ditches that my friend Robert Smith had talked about a few days earlier. “I’m going to call it something not correctly,” he warned, “but I call it green slime. You talk about the food chain now … this is the stuff that feeds all of us starting from the bottom up! What happens when that’s gone?” he wondered, “and no one’s talking about it!”
http://culturemap.com/newsdetail/07-21- ... een-slime/


MEADE —

The blue-green algae bloom at Meade State Lake is toxic.
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment confirmed test results Friday showing the bloom's concentration exceeds recommendations from the World Health Organization for recreational water use.

http://www.dodgeglobe.com/news/x4520782 ... m-is-toxic

Image


A satellite image has revealed the scale of a vast algal bloom spreading in the Baltic Sea.

The potentially toxic bloom, covering 377,000 sq km, could pose a risk to marine life in the region, warn scientists.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10740097

Anybody convinced yet? Cause if not, I can show tons more...

Here's a video of it washing up on the beach in Destin, FL


http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkUzVAB5uWfc
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

'Green goo' biofuel gets a boost


updated 10:28 p.m. EDT, Sun August 23, 2009

(CNN) -- Three years ago many would have dismissed the notion that a significant supply of the world's automotive fuel could come from algae. But today the idea, while still an adventurous one, is getting much harder to ignore.
Making green from green: Biofuel from algae has been given a boost in investment in recent years.

Making green from green: Biofuel from algae has been given a boost in investment in recent years.

Back then there were only a handful of companies seriously focused on producing algae fuel. Now there are well over 50, according to Samhitha Udupa, a research associate with Lux Research.

The number should double within the next year or two, she adds, and private investment in algae fuel ventures has at least doubled every year since 2006, a trend likely to continue.

Last month ExxonMobil-- which has been publicly skeptical of other biofuels in the past -- invested up to $600 million into a collaborative R&D program with Synthetic Genomics, a startup founded by J. Craig Venter.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/08 ... index.html

Revelation 11:7
When they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up out of the abyss will make war with them, and overcome them and kill them.
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

Winterkitty

User avatar

apprentice-8

Posts: 438

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:31 am

Post Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:20 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Great find, Stompk!

This should really help folks put the pieces of the puzzle together and see for themselves what is really going down. ***** :D
The truth... more cleansing than a dozen bran muffins.
<<

stompk

User avatar

scribe-0

Posts: 586

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:19 pm

Location: Above the Lake of Lost Souls

Post Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Winterkitty wrote:Great find, Stompk!

This should really help folks put the pieces of the puzzle together and see for themselves what is really going down. ***** :D


Thanks. The rabbit hole goes even deeper. Craig Venter owns a company called Synthetic Genomics

Synthetic Genomics Inc. was founded to commercialize genomic-driven technologies. Our scientific strength lies in the decades of pioneering research by founders, J. Craig Venter, Ph.D., Nobel Laureate Hamilton O. Smith, M.D., and the leading scientific teams they have assembled. Dr. Venter and his teams have proven track records of making scientific breakthroughs that translate into viable commercial solutions.

http://www.syntheticgenomics.com/about/

Guess who the largest investors in this company are.

Investors

The company's largest investors include: BP plc; Biotechonomy LLC; Draper Fisher Jurvetson; Plenus, S.A. de C.V.; ACGT Sdn Bhd; and Meteor Group.

http://www.syntheticgenomics.com/about/

Fucking BP!

More about Craig Venter.


http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DQHIocNOHd7A
But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
<<

aegon

apprentice-0

Posts: 2

Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:40 pm

Post Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:07 pm

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

dont forget about china. they had an oil spill aswell...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... 00x450.jpg
<<

unityemissions

User avatar

scribe-3

Posts: 743

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:32 pm

Post Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:24 am

Re: Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?

Good work, Stompk

:star5:

I'm going to check through the links over the next few and see if I can find anything else to contribute. The energy crisis is here, and will only get worse if something is not miraculously done NOW. So, this actually makes a bit of sense.

:coolthumb:
Striving for absolute independence is a foolish as wishing for co-dependence. The cosmos is an interdependent being, and we are the integral between subject and object. --UE

INTP

Return to Oil Spill



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.
Portal powered by phpGrr! © 2009 James Ball