Is the real reason for the Oil Disaster, to introduce an invasive species?
OK, the coincidences are just too bizarre.
It starts with this article that I found today...
BERKELEY, Calif. — BP's catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is fueling opposition to the University of California, Berkeley's research partnership with the British company, with activists on the famously liberal campus demanding a severing of ties.
The oil giant gave UC Berkeley a $500 million grant in 2007 to create the Energy Biosciences Institute, which works to develop new sources of plant-based fuel. The 10-year deal is believed to be the largest-ever corporate sponsorship of university research, but has outraged students and professors who worry the global oil company will exert too much influence over academic research and damage the university's reputation.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... AD9HA60701
$500 million was "donated" by BP? A British based company donates 1/2 billion dollars to a US College to find fuel alternatives. Something stinks. So I dug a little deeper.
Now on the face of things, the Energy Biosciences Institute looks like a good thing, trying to create alternative fuels from plant species. But that all goes away when one digs a little deeper.
To provide alternatives to petroleum-based energy, enhance global security, and reduce carbon emissions, the U.S. government has mandated a greater proportion of our energy portfolio be derived from plant-based fuels (i.e., 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act; EISA). However, the potential benefits of this nascent bioeconomy may be offset by damage to our biosecurity via land-use change, inappropriate agronomics, rapid adoption of novel crops, and/or lack of proper federal oversight (1). Of these potential externalities—the unintended and often negative effects or byproducts from an activity—little attention has been given to economic or ecological damage from invasive biofuel feedstocks. For example, many plant species proposed, and in some cases under development, for biofuel production in the U.S. are invasive species or have a high likelihood of escaping cultivation and becoming invasive
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y
I would ask folks to take a second and read the article. It is quite scary, and is a link I followed from here: http://www.energybiosciencesinstitute.org/
Now, here's where it get's real creepy. Remember the conspiracy theory out a bit ago about turning the Gulf into a dead zone, for creating algae for biofuels? Guess what?
In addition to terrestrial and aquatic macrophyte species, the energy industry is evaluating algae for renewable production of starches for alcohols, lipids for diesel fuel surrogates, and H2 for fuel cells (21). Algae have been shown to produce 250 times more oil than soybeans per unit area, and up to 31 times more oil per area than African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) (22). However, a number of non-native algal species are being considered for biomass, but despite the potentially severe environmental risks, they have yet to be evaluated for their potential escape and impacts. For example, strains of freshwater cyanobacteria such as Anabaena circinalis, Oscillatoria agardhii, and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii produce blooms known to cause serious illness or death to humans and animals. Open-water cultivation of non-native, or highly modified native algae, present an unknown risk to our waterways, drinking water reserves, and higher trophic level effects
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y
When I read that, the hairs on the back of my neck stood up.
But it gets even creepier...
On June 20th, 2010, a blogger named JoAnneMor wrote this...
What they are doing is in three steps.
First get rid of oil industry in Gulf.
Then turn Gulf into a dead zone. A dead zone is free of life or ability to sustain it. The oil, dispersants and fertilizers deplete oxygen. It kills animals and fish, also turning their remains into fertilizer.
Finally, use Gulf as a giant Algae farm. Algae grows on water surface, getting oxygen from air, not water. Fertilizers like Urea supply much needed nitrogen. The Mississippi and the other rivers that empty into Gulf also pick up fertilizers from the many farms along the way. This feeds the Algae at the mouths of these rivers.
The oil in the water won't hurt the Algae. It will only promote it's growth and burn factor.
Algae costs about $2. a Barrel to refine. This is potentially very profitable.
http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill
But this is what really got my attention...
That plan involves projects in the Great Lakes., Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico.
http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill
OK, so officially, I am creeped out...It can't be just a coincidence that this Michigan oil spill is just in the right spot to feed into the Great Lakes...And Chesapeake Bay?
Remember the National Exercise called SONS 2010, which, on April 29th, 2010 held an exercise to combat an oil spill of "national significance" in the Chesapeake Bay?
Date: April 29, 2010
The oil spill response organization, Oil In The Bay, has deployed 60,000 feet of containment boom from Goose Pond to Moss Pond, and in small waterways. Approximately 500,000 more feet of boom has been ordered.
An estimated 12.6 million gallons of Mayan crude oil were originally onboard. The amount of oil spilled in the Chesapeake Bay is currently estimated at 2.25 million gallons. The Captain Banner crew is transferring oil from the ruptured tank to an undamaged tank to minimize spillage.
http://www.sons2010.com/go/doc/2221/515695
The devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is now going on 51 days. Various news reports and prediction modeling has suggested that there is a high probability oil will go beyond the Gulf of Mexico and enter into the Atlantic Ocean. What does that mean for our Chesapeake Bay? Will the oil reach as far north as our bay waters?
http://www.examiner.com/x-43633-Anne-Ar ... apeake-Bay
Now, today, ATS had an interesting thread, by DRJay1975.
Drove over the beach into Destin
, which is a very populated visible area, very different from where I just stopped. As soon as you cross the bridge, huge cleanup crews. Here they are picking up tarballs, unlike orange beach, that story will blow your mind. But they have booms and boats everywhere puttin on a show here. Nothing but the occasional tarball. Until I stepped out on my balcony. Hmm I've never seen the water look like this. Beautiful blue, except from the beach out about 50 yards. Weird green algae bloom. Never seen that here. Very thick. Authorities say it's seaweed. Nope. Looks like the same green algae you'd see in a small stagnant pond.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread598797/pg1
And last, but not least...
All along the coast, people speak of a lack of regulatory commitment and investment in scientific research on the gulf by state and federal lawmakers.
They note, for example, that over the last decade, the Environmental Protection Agency’s financing for the Chesapeake Bay Program, a regional and federal partnership, was nearly five times the amount for a similar Gulf of Mexico program, and a Great Lakes program was given more than four times as much.
http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/201 ... ?p=3&tc=pg





















stompk - i look forwarding to following!

