Hi All,

With the recent terror attack on a Russian passenger train, it's gotten me curious. I read an article recently,"Nothing comes from nothing". The powers behind Russia have been at odds with the powers behind the USA for quite some time. Just as the article title implies, these terror attacks do come from somewhere; a group that has an agenda.

Many of Russia's terror attacks were as a direct response of opposing forces from the wars in the Caucasus. Remember all those wars that we barely heard mention of in the 1990's, but the US was involved in by offering aid, and military support continually? Those same **Muslim** groups that were supported by the pro Christian US government, committed tremendous amounts of terror against the average Russian populace. Look at where things are at today. Russia is again at strong odds with the USA, and again we have terrorism in the Motherland.

Of course this is all on the hypothetical end, or conjectured end of the spectrum, but the trends, historical accounts, and current events do lend credence to the US Government selectively promoting, and using terror organizations to further agendas. The current, and most apparent US support for terrorists is the Jundallah terror organization operating in Iran. Yes, it is a fact thatAmerica is secretly funding militant ethnic separatist groups in Iran in an attempt to pile pressure on the Islamic regime to give up its nuclear programme.

Recently a high ranking Jundallah terrorist named Abdolhamid Rigi, who is already sentenced to death,insisted that five years ago when the relationship began the US government gave the group $100,000 and promised to provide it with “everything we needed.” He also claimed that the US was directing the group’s attacks, saying “they told us whom to shoot and whom not to. All orders came from them.”

The fact is the US has openly tried to overthrow the Iranian Government since the early 80's when they disposed of the puppet government installed by the USA. Now the current argument is that Iran poses a thread to world, because of it's nuclear ambitions. The funny thing is, that by the NNPT the USA, France, and others are required to build Iran's nuclear facilities. We, my friends agreed to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty as well, but our end of the bargain is to aid Iran in building their admittedly, for peaceful intentions nuclear technology.

So, the natural argument becomes that the USA can, and will support terrorist organizations when, and where ever necessary to further the standing policies of the US Government. It would lend credence that current terror attack in Russia could very likely be from the USA. We did support the Muhadajeen against the Soviets in the 1980's, but later this same group became the supposed terror group of Al Queda. Of course, all of it is necessary to spread the torch of Liberty, right?

Interestingly enough, from looking at the trends, historical accounts, and current events it seems the US Policy is nothing, but a sham. It is designed to support covert wars, and terrorism; which in turn are needed not for a policy of Liberty, but a policy dictated by corporate interests. An example of this is the climate of impunity that has trickled down through Afghan society. Rights groups accuse soldiers and police loyal to warlords of kidnapping, extortion, robbery and the rape of women, girls and boys. We kicked the Taliban out supposedly because of Osama Bin Laden, and when we kicked them out the US Policy was to reintroduce the Opium trade that the Taliban had all, but eradicated. The present Afghanistan government is full of Warlords that cooperate.

The fact of the real US Policy throughout the world seems to be more in line with "business as usual", or what is in the best interests of the corporations. A couple examples of this are;
The US military in Afghanistan is to be allowed to pay Taliban fighters who renounce violence against the government in Kabul. The terms are included in a defense bill which President Barack Obama is due to sign later on Wednesday. Washington has authorized $1.3bn (£691m) for the fund. Such payments have already been widely used by US

We are not liberating, but bribing the Taliban now for their assistance in furthering the real "corporate policy". Another mind blowing example is, In this grotesque carnival, the US military's contractors are forced to pay suspected insurgents to protect American supply routes. It is an accepted fact of the military logistics operation in Afghanistan that the US government funds the very forces American troops are fighting. And it is a deadly irony, because these funds add up to a huge amount of money for the Taliban. "It's a big part of their income," one of the top Afghan government security officials admits. In fact, US military officials in Kabul estimate that a minimum of 10% of the Pentagon's logistics contracts – hundreds of millions of dollars – consists of payments to insurgents.

The fact of the matter is the US Government is waging a "War on Terror", but quietly supporting terrorism. Of course, it uses fancy names such as resistance, guerrilla fighter, etc., but non the less these same groups are carrying out attacks which create terror upon the societies they effect. It is becoming apparent that in Afghanistan this same double standard holds true; as the newly formed, and Liberated government is comprised of reformed terrorists. The fact of the matter is US Policy changes upon the dictates of the private corporate masters.

Terrorism is the US Policy across the world for anyone who is a state of non compliance, in accordance to the corporate policy.

Peace,

Sancho